|
Musing about
Marlon
By Sara Emrie

When Marlon Brando died, I
started thinking about him and me and the past. Thinking
about the past usually brings up all kinds of things: “what
ifs” and “if onlys,” all ego stuff to be sure. I felt okay,
however, so maybe I wasn’t thinking at all. Maybe it
should be called musing.
It is not unusual to muse,
I muse, when a public figure dies who is respected
and admired. It is not like losing a loved one, a family
member or a friend. I never knew Marlon personally so I
can’t feel any guilt, you know, that I didn’t call, I
didn’t write … But I loved Marlon Brando and,
illusion or not, I was grateful to share the planet with
him.
First, there was his work. He
was a powerful method actor, the technique I studied
and understood. His best acting came from a place deep
within his soul. He was able to touch something so real
within himself – so universally human – that the
characters he created are part of theatre and movie history.
Second, he cared about people.
He marched with Martin Luther King and was a supporter of
the American Indian Movement. He took unusual and unpopular
stands. He refused an Oscar in order to publicize the plight
of native Americans. In defense of human rights, Marlon made
personally courageous statements.
Marlon must have loved to act
in the beginning but after he became famous he seemed to
reject show business and turn his back on stardom. Always a
mysterious and private person, he became a virtual recluse
when tragedies happened in his family (including a murder by
his son and the suicide of his daughter). Like Orson Welles,
he was beautiful in youth and obese in old age; unlike
Orson, who always seemed to be trying to relive past
successes and get back to his glory days, Marlon just seemed
to want … out.
No, I muse. Marlon was a lot
like me. From the time I was 10, I wanted to be an actor.
Growing up in the buttoned-down ‘50s and early ‘60s, acting
helped me deal with a world that discouraged spontaneity and
encouraged conformity. In the theatre I could use my entire
self – body, voice, mind – to be a character that
said something within the structure of a play.
Playing a part allowed me to be a different person – someone
other than the prim, pretty, conventional girl that I
appeared to be. Acting freed me. I could
think.
I moved to Hollywood because
my cousin Mary, who had been peripherally involved in The
Biz, lived in the nearby San Fernando Valley. I lived at the
Hollywood Studio Club, enrolled in acting class, was cast in
a showcase and tried to get an agent. Not a bad start – but
within two years I knew in my heart that although I loved
acting, I didn’t have what it took to succeed in show
business. I was realistic; I tried to stop. I quit trying to
make it and did other things.
I worked on relationships that
always failed (including a marriage); went back to school (I
could never get through physics); tried to change the world
through politics (that didn’t happen, did it?); and
concentrated on writing (most of which I never finished).
Finally I moved to New York. Broadway was certainly the more
respectable place for a serious actor. Somehow I ended up
joining the unions and becoming one of the hundreds of
thousands of actors who did showcases, took classes, and
worked day jobs to support their dream.
I muse on my turbulent
emotional life then! Think of a combination of several
Tennessee Williams characters (Blanche in Streetcar
and Hannah in Night of the Iguana?). Or Truman
Capote’s Holly Golightly in Breakfast at Tiffanys. Or
imagine someone that Capote, Williams and William Inge
thought up. I, too, suffered from the Mean Reds. Like
the characters I longed to play, I was a small town girl who
struggled with what it was to love and be loved, cried for
humanity in general, tried to find a light at the end of a
very dark tunnel, and was just short of being mad as a
hatter quite often. I was outrageous. But I always
got up in the morning, went to work, and got to that acting
class which gave my life meaning.
I first heard “The opposite of
fear is love” in an acting discussion about how to overcome
stage fright. I never forgot that – and then in 1985 I was
guided to this Course which said exactly the same
thing, but went further -- A Course in Miracles
taught that the only choice is the one between love
and fear. Those blue books seemed to provide what I had
needed for years.
One of the last showcases I
did in NYC was a well-written and sensitive play dealing
with rape and the denial that it had happened. It was a
memory play and I played the grown up character, with
another actor playing my young self. I was doing the
Workbook of A Course in Miracles© and had begun to
question my entire life. I was overjoyed to find that I
could act and walk away from the character when the
play was over. Every feeling I needed was still there but it
wasn’t me. I was something different from the role I was
playing as well as the person I’d always thought I was.
After four years of studying
the Course, I had a breakthrough that no words can
adequately describe; like Maslow’s “peak experience,” it had
nothing to do with me and everything to do
with me. The Voice of Christ (or Jesus or the Holy Spirit)
said “God Is. There is only One and We are all It and
therefore you are also It!” I was by myself at the time
but I knew that I would never be really alone again. I could
not deny that Voice. My acting career just – stopped.
I had forgiveness work to do.
I had to mend fences with my exes. I had to thank the living
and the dead for the love they had given me and let them
know that I did love them and that I knew we had both done
our best. Forgiveness was a necessary part of transforming
my feeling that I was a character in someone else’s play
(generally playing the role of “victim”) and claiming for
both of us my new understanding of who we are. Relationships
never end. Although we seldom realize it, we all play equal
parts in an infinite production. The company includes
everyone and appreciation and applause are the only
correct responses.
And it is necessary for me to
teach in order to continue to learn. In true method actor
fashion my experience is a visceral one which has sometimes
been difficult to explain in words; I can only bear witness
to the incredible change the Course has made in my
life by sharing the Course with others. We are all
teachers and students in an abstract universe, remembering
our Identity. Jesus tells us “The way is not hard, but it
is very different.” It is hard to explain to anyone how
different my life is now. Maybe it isn’t even necessary. The
only reason for musing about it at all is to express my
gratitude.
My small ACIM study group is
reading Chapter 11. The section From Darkness to Light
speaks so clearly of the journey I have made. Fear and grief
were my dark companions for most of my life. Now, I know
miracles – the miracle of this little group, of friendship
and understanding – and the companionship of my little
Manuelito, age 6, who is learning to read and think but more
importantly to muse. I would never have imagined, 20
years ago, that letting go of who I thought I was, would
bring such gifts of joy and peace. Only God could have done
this. Only God was always doing it. Realizing that there is
nothing opposite to God is why this way “is very
different.”
I wonder where Marlon was at
the end? I feel deeply connected to him. I too struggled to
keep faith with my ideals in a world that made no sense; I
too wrestled with my actor’s ego. But in spite of grief,
guilt and fear, God gave all of us a tiny spark that the
dark companions can never extinguish. That spark was the
source of Marlon’s artistry.
The actor Marlon has gone, but
in Truth his spark has joined the Great Rays of God. He is
resting now, peaceful and healed. He is Home.
Thank you, Marlon, for your
gifts. Thank you, God, for this life that we share. Namaste.
Sara
Emrie is a long time student/teacher of ACIM, an
Interfaith Minister and first and foremost the mother of
Manny Emrie.
|